翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R. v. Morales : ウィキペディア英語版
R v Morales

''R v Morales'', () 3 S.C.R. 711, is a case decided by the Supreme Court of Canada. The Court found that the "public interest" basis for pre-trial detention under section 515 of the ''Criminal Code'' violated section 11(e) of the ''Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms'', the right not to be denied reasonable bail, as it authorized detention on vague and imprecise grounds, and could not be saved by section 1.
==Background==
Decision maker Maximo Morales was being investigated in his participation in a cocaine importation ring in Canada. He was arrested in December 1990 and charged with trafficking and possession for the purpose of trafficking under the ''Narcotics Control Act'' and ''Criminal Code''.
At his bail hearing the judge denied his release and ordered him to be detained until the trial. The detention was based on section 515 of the Code which allowed detention where it "is necessary in the public interest or for the protection or safety of the public, having regard to all the circumstances including any substantial likelihood that the accused will ... commit a criminal offence or interfere with the administration of justice".
Morales applied for a review of the judge's order. He was granted release with conditions. The release was appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the "public interest" component of section 515 violated sections 7, 9, 11(d) or 11(e) of the ''Charter'', and if so, whether it could be saved under section 1.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R v Morales」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.